Atwoli warns of potential diversion of housing levy to other projects under new rules
The union boss wants the new regulations, which is yet to be ratified by the AG, halted immediately and a fresh participatory process initiated
Central Organisation of Trade Unions (Cotu) Secretary General Francis Atwoli has raised concerns over possible misuse of the housing levy after MPs passed new regulations that could see the funds diverted to other projects to the detriment of workers, who solely contribute to the kitty.
In a statement, Atwoli said Affordable Housing Regulations passed by the National Assembly introduce a loophole that could see the money channeled to construct health facilities, pre-primary education centers, basic education centers, fire stations, police posts, social halls, markets and open spaces under the guise of the clause “associated social infrastructure.”
He said that while they are crucial, the projects fall outside the core mandate of providing decent and affordable housing for Kenyan workers.
“While these are all important public services, they fall well outside the scope of what Kenyan workers were promised when this levy was introduced,” said Atwoli.
The union boss now wants the process, which is yet to be ratified by the Attorney General, halted immediately and a fresh participatory one initiated.
Reiterating Cotu’s unwavering support for the Affordable Housing Program, Atwoli appealed to President William Ruto to intervene “decisively” protect the rights of workers and ensure that the Fund is used solely for its intended purpose.
“It must be noted that COTU supported the Affordable Housing Program in good faith, with the understanding and expectation that our members, who shoulder the the burden of this levy, would benefit directly through access to dignified, decent and affordable housing. Unfortunately, at no point were the Kenyan workers represented by COTU, who form 90 percent of the contributors, nor was their representative on the Board consulted during the drafting of these regulations,” he added.
“Noting, therefore, that the regulations were adopted by Parliament without involving workers or their representatives, we will not stand by and watch as members contributions are diverted from the primary purpose of providing homes.”
