SUPKEM distance itself from Ruto, Gachagua ouster petition
The Supreme Council of Kenyan Muslims (SUPKEM) has distanced itself from the recent court petition seeking the removal of president William Ruto and his deputy, Rigathi Gachagua.
SUPKEM chairman, Alhaji Hassan Ole Naado stated they were not consulted before they were named as an interested party in the case.
Hassan elaborated that the constitution of SUPKEM mandates consultation with relevant organs before engaging in any court processes; explaining that the protocol was not followed, rendering SUPKEM’s involvement unauthorized and illegitimate.
“We in SUPKEM wish to disassociate ourselves from this court process because we were NOT consulted before being enjoined as an Interested Party. The issue must have been tabled before the relevant organs of the Council, and a decision taken following the appropriate process in the present case, the relevant organ of the Council was not consulted before the Council was committed as an Interested Party.” They said in their statement.
SUPKEM’s leadership resolved to approach the court to seek the council’s removal from the case.
“The leadership of SUPKEM will approach the honorable court seized of this matter to have SUPKEM discharged as an Interested Party.” They said.
A petition was filed by Cyprian Nyamwamu and 13 others at the High Court of Kenya in Nairobi, which lists SUPKEM as the 14th interested party.
The court order, issued by Bahati Mwamuye on July 24, 2024, required SUPKEM to file a response by August 16, 2024.
Hassan emphasized that SUPKEM was unaware of its inclusion in the case until the court order was served.
“The Court order by Hon Bahati Mwamuye J. dated July 24, 2024, on the case filed by Cyprian Nyamwamu & 13 others has been placed in our hands. The Supreme Council of Kenya Muslims has been cited as the 14th Interested Party to the case and is required to file a response to the application thereof by August 16, 2024.”
However, SUPKEM stated that they are still in stand with Gen Z following the historic revolution protests.
“SUPKEM stands by its earlier position that following the historic protests by Gen Z that pricked the conscience of our nation, the country needs to have a very serious conversation with itself to ensure that the genuine issues raised by Gen Z are addressed comprehensively and with finality.”
While expressing support for a national dialogue, Hassan stressed that such dialogue should occur within the framework of the Constitution.
He invoked Article 2 of the Constitution, which stipulates that no person may claim or exercise State authority except as authorized under the Constitution.
“Our position is that the issues raised by Gen Z cannot be addressed outside the structures provided in our Constitution. In holding this position, we are guided by the provisions of Article 2 of the Constitution and Article 10 on national values and principles of governance, which include the rule of law, democracy, and participation of the people.” He said.
The chairman urged those opposed to dialogue to reconsider their stance and called for an inclusive national conversation.
He also warned the political class against using the opportunity for dialogue to entrench vested interests at the expense of addressing the legitimate grievances of the youth.
“We urge those who are opposed to dialogue to rethink their stand and embrace the call for an inclusive national dialogue. But we also call upon the political class not to use the opportunity for dialogue to entrench their vested interests at the expense of the well-meaning grievances raised by our young people.” He added.
